fanatic fandom

My other blog is a BMW. But this is a bandanna-pink Volkswagen Beetle - for flirty frivolous fun and fanatic fandom. This is where i get to play the bimbonic-geek and rave, enthuse, bitch and rant about anything and everything under the sun. Feel free to chip in!

Friday, September 28, 2007

words, words, words

Words are what we live in. We think with them, speak with them, even act with them. Where can we live, but in words?

Language matters because, by making articulate our perceptions of the world, it defines the world. And is in turn defined by the world.

Here's literary critic George Steiner on the intersection between language and history:

"Use a language to conceive, organise, and justify Belsen; use it to make out specifications for gas ovens; use it to dehumanise man during twelve years of calculated bestiality. Something will happen to it... Something of the lies and sadism will settle in the marrow of the language. Imperceptibly at first, like the poisons of radiation sifting silently into the bone. But the cancer will begin, and the deep-set destruction. The language will no longer grow and freshen. It will no longer perform, quite as well as it used to, its two principal functions: the conveyance of humane order which we call law, and the communication of the quick of the human spirit which we call grace."
...
...

Thursday, September 27, 2007

more coetzee

Here's something else from Life & Times of Michael K.


"When he thought of Wynberg Park he thought of an earth more vegetal than mineral, composed of last year's rotted leaves and the year before's and so on back till the beginning of time, an earth so soft that one could dig and never come to the end of the softness; one could dig to the centre of the earth from Wynbert Park, and all the way to the centre it would be cool and dark and damp and soft. I have lost my love for that kind of earth, he thought, I no longer care to feel that kind of earth between my fingers. It is no longer the green and the brown that I want but the yellow and the red; not the wet but the dry; not the dark but the light; not the soft but the hard. I am becoming a different kind of man, he thought, if there are two kinds of man. If I were cut, he thought, holding his wrists out, looking at his wrists, the blood would no longer gush from me but seep, and after a little seeping dry and heal. I am becoming smaller and harder and drier every day. If I were to die here, sitting in the mouth of my cave looking out over the plain with my knees under my chin, I would be dried out by the wind in a day, I would be preserved whole, like someone in the desert drowned in sand."


(J.M. Coetzee)


-----------------------------------------------

Someone once described Coetzee's writing as 'pitiless' - and she didn't mean that as a compliment. I agree that his writing lacks pity - but then I don't see 'pity' as a hallmark of good writing. I don't even see it as a hallmark of humane writing. What Coetzee seems to have, as a writer, is not pity, but compassion. Even at his most brutal, he accords his characters dignity, refusing to patronise, holding their pain at a distance so that as readers, we are not allowed to wallow in a cathartic wash of sympathy, but are forced to consider their suffering from an angle that is almost, but not quite, impersonal.

The effect is devastating.

-----------------------------------------------

Edit: 19 Oct 07

Here's something taken from a friend's blog on pity and compassion that I think illuminates what I said earlier in this entry.

"...pity implies a power relationship: pity is kindness shown to people/beings less advantaged than you; pity is predicated on weakness. We pity the poor, we pity the wounded. We pity celebrities or politicians though they have wealth and power: we pity them based on their lack of privacy, their (perceived?) lack of "a normal life".... You can pity people who aren't liked, because you feel somehow better, by being "liked".

Because pity involves power, it is possible that through pity, we ignore or obscure the humanity of those being pitied. The poor become a class, the sick become a mass, and pity continues as long as the pitier can maintain an idea of the weakness of the pitied.

Compassion is kindness based on the recognition that we are all beings that suffer. If pity denies individuality by relagating the recipient of kindness to powerlessness; compassion, while not necessarily suggesting it, at least leaves the nature of the individuality open...

Compassion, like pity, can be extended both below and above. But through compassion, because there is no need for weakness as a condition of kindness, we now have a way to show kindness to those above us who tend to oppress, to acknowledge that no matter how powerful the control exerted, at its core lies a being subject to suffering. Compassion allows us to return the face to the force that turns us faceless: it is through compassion we return the face to the authority and also to ourselves...

... Faced with the certainty that we suffer, and also of the uncertainty of how another suffers, in our compassion lies the possibility for kindness without condescension, the kindness of an individual being to an individual being."
...
...

Wednesday, September 26, 2007

a spare, thrifty world

Now that I'm onto this business of putting up things I'm surprised I haven't put up earlier, it's high time that Nobel Prize-winning novelist J.M. Coetzee got some column space.

I've always loved Coetzee's writing. He's one writer who makes me feel that every single word he writes is carefully weighed and absolutely essential. This is the case, whatever the style of the particular piece.

Here's the man himself on his use of language:

"...when I write myself I... quite laboriously search out the right word. I do believe in spareness. Spare prose and a spare, thrifty world."

Here's the last paragraph of his Booker-winning novel, Life & Times of Michael K. Don't worry so much about the context - suffice to say that it's a novel that's partly about resilience - just savour the language and the clear yet unforced symbolism:

"And if the old man climbed out of the cart and stretched himself (things were gathering pace now) and looked at where the pump had been that the soldiers had blown up so that nothing should be left standing, and complained, saying, "What are we going to do about water?", he, Michael K, would produce a teaspoon from his pocket, a teaspoon and a long roll of string. He would clear the rubble from the mouth of the shaft, he would bend the handle of the teaspoon in a loop and tie the string to it, he would lower it down the shaft deep into the earth, and when he brought it up there would be water in the bowl of the spoon; and in that way, he would say, one can live."
...
...

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

no disaster

Another surprise - this time, that this poem did not make it to this blog any earlier. I've always loved it.


Here's a comment I adapted from the Wondering Minstrels site.

"I think loss works pretty darn well in verse. And I'm also certain Elizabeth Bishop understood all this. Perhaps better than she might have cared to. There is a courageous pretense built into this poem that I like. Bishop is wry, funny and flippant and very determined not to sound weepy-eyed. The fierce repetition of the line "the art of losing's not hard to master" makes you wonder how far and fast she's had to lose. To me Bishop is valiantly attempting to make believe for a while that the experience of loss may be impersonalised into perfection by practising it as an art, in the form of a villanelle, no less. That she succeeds in convincing neither herself nor her reader, hurts her verse not the least."

- Pavithra Krishnan


------------------------------------------------------------------

One Art

The art of losing isn't hard to master;
so many things seem filled with the intent
to be lost that their loss is no disaster.

Lose something every day. Accept the fluster
of lost door keys, the hour badly spent.
The art of losing isn't hard to master.

Then practice losing farther, losing faster:
places, and names, and where it was you meant
to travel. None of these will bring disaster.

I lost my mother's watch. And look! my last, or
next-to-last, of three loved houses went.
The art of losing isn't hard to master.

I lost two cities, lovely ones. And, vaster,
some realms I owned, two rivers, a continent.
I miss them, but it wasn't a disaster.

--- Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture
I love) I shan't have lied. It's evident
the art of losing's not too hard to master
though it may look like (Write it!) like disaster.


(Elizabeth Bishop)
...
...

Sunday, September 23, 2007

call and answer

What's surprising is that it took me so long to discover this, dishwashing fanatic that I am.

What joyous writing. I am so glad that Love has called me back to the things of this world.

--------------------------------------------

Love Calls Us To The Things Of This World


......The eyes open to a cry of pulleys,
And spirited from sleep, the astounded soul
Hangs for a moment bodiless and simple
As false dawn.
........................Outside the open window
The morning air is all awash with angels.

......Some are in bed-sheets, some are in blouses,
Some are in smocks: but truly there they are.
Now they are rising together in calm swells
Of halcyon feeling, filling whatever they wear
With the deep joy of their impersonal breathing;

......Now they are flying in place, conveying
The terrible speed of their omnipresence, moving
And staying like white water; and now of a sudden
They swoon down into so rapt a quiet
That nobody seems to be there.
......................................................The soul shrinks

......From all that it is about to remember,
From the punctual rape of every blessèd day,
And cries,
................“Oh, let there be nothing on earth but laundry,
Nothing but rosy hands in the rising steam
And clear dances done in the sight of heaven.”

......Yet, as the sun acknowledges
With a warm look the world’s hunks and colors,
The soul descends once more in bitter love
To accept the waking body, saying now
In a changed voice as the man yawns and rises,
......“Bring them down from their ruddy gallows;
Let there be clean linen for the backs of thieves;
Let lovers go fresh and sweet to be undone,
And the heaviest nuns walk in a pure floating
Of dark habits,
........................keeping their difficult balance.”


(Richard Wilbur)
...
...

heart and head

June 2006: Discovery of A.A. Gill, journalist extraordinaire with the pen sharp as nettle, with the gift of words that stay, stinging in the air, long after you've put him down.

September 2007: Re-discovery of A.A. Gill after a long time away, mentally, from the love of words and new discoveries. I am glad to be back.

----------------------------------------------

Here's A.A. Gill on the art of criticism:

'(Cyril Connolly's) writing is precise and elegant, but never effete or pedantic. Rather muscly and exuberant, it fizzes and sings with enthusiasm. All memorable, worthwhile criticism grows out of enthusiasm. It can never be the schoolmaster's dry marginalia or the collector's pursed lips and raised brow; only if you love something can you be transported when it's done beautifully, and infuriated when it's made badly. Great criticism is cerebral and emotional. But it is the head that is the passenger and reads the map, and the heart that has the wheel.


(from 'Foreword', Previous Convictions)
...
...

looking for a hero

In the words of another blogging friend: "I neeeeed a heeeerooo."

Not, as some may think, in order to have a person to look up to. Hero worship, for me, has very little to do with specific people, though of course I was not aware of this when I was much younger. My first heroes were Diego Maradona (1986 to 1994: even the tenacity of my adulation could not survive his drug convictions during the 1994 World Cup) and Ludwig van Beethoven (1987 to some-point-in-the-recent-past: the dead are beyond making mistakes and can thus be safely admired forever). Worlds apart, centuries apart - one a South American poor-boy-made-good, given to on-the-field histrionics and taking the name of the Lord in vain, but oh, when he played the Beautiful Game, what poetry was there! The other, a crusty, defiant, deaf German composer who wrote some of the most sublime music the world has ever heard to this day. But the two were really, in some ways, one and the same - and the prototypes for every single other 'hero' I've ever looked up to since.

In both the footballer and the composer, I saw resilience, strength, a refusal to abide by society's conventions when there was no good reason for doing so, and, above all - passion and excellence in their particular fields of endeavour. And it is because I need to believe that these traits are possible, that they are not merely unrealisable ideals, that I seek out people who embody them in lived reality.

So, who are my latest heroes? Unfortunately, the ability to hero-worship seems to decline with age. I no longer have a hero, and doubt if I'll ever have one again. A certain youthful blinkered-ness is needed to focus exclusively on all the things that make a person superhuman, and pretend that the all-too-human flaws are not there. And I do think that a certain clear-eyed-ness about human behaviour does come as one grows older, together with an increasing ability to accept that, this side of paradise, this ol' world is gonna keep on gettin' ya down unless ya adjust yer expectations somewhat to allow people to be just that: people.

Nonetheless, I'm grateful for my old heroes, and I'd heartily recommend them to anyone currently looking for a hero. Far better to idolise people who are several removes from your immediate lived reality, whose flaws and follies you can turn a convenient blind eye to, than to hero-worship someone within one's circle only to find that one's idol has clay feet.


Edit 31 Jan 2008:

Hot off the press: Maradona has just issued a public apology for his 'hand of God' goal against England in the 1986 World Cup.

Ok, can the 'me' of 2008 say to the 'me' of 1986: I don't believe you actually liked this guy so much! Check out that titanic ego! It would be enough to make anyone want to puke, if not that it were also so darned funny.
...
...

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

a touch of frost

Some poems contain within them ideas / emotions / states of being that are almost impossible to articulate. You cannot help but feel that there is more going on in the words and in the silences than you could ever explain or understand. Here's something by Robert Frost, that wonderfully cunning New Englander with the death-wish woven into wreaths of autumn-gold leaves and scented grasses. i've always loved this poem, and if TS Eliot was right, and genuine poetry communicates before it is understood, then i guess this must be genuine poetry.

There is something almost Brahmsian about the depth of emotion almost straitjacketed into form.

Accompanying the poem is a commentary by Filipino-American poet Luisa Igloria.


---------------------------------------------------

To Earthward

Love at the lips was touch
As sweet as I could bear;
And once that seemed too much;
I lived on air

That crossed me from sweet things,
The flow of—was it musk
From hidden grapevine springs
Downhill at dusk?

I had the swirl and ache
From sprays of honeysuckle
That when they’re gathered shake
Dew on the knuckle.

I craved strong sweets, but those
Seemed strong when I was young;
The petal of the rose
It was that stung.

Now no joy but lacks salt,
That is not dashed with pain
And weariness and fault;
I crave the stain

Of tears, the aftermark
Of almost too much love,
The sweet of bitter bark
And burning clove.

When stiff and sore and scarred
I take away my hand
From leaning on it hard
In grass and sand,

The hurt is not enough:
I long for weight and strength
To feel the earth as rough
To all my length.


(Robert Frost)

-------------------------------------------------

"...Wasn’t it Mark Doty who said we should give thanks for metaphors, because they “go on ahead of us, they know before we do… [they] serve as a container for emotion and idea, a vessel that can hold what’s too slippery or charged or too difficult to touch?” In Robert Frost’s “To Earthward,” the charged and difficult subject is everything that tilts us toward the absolute and our inevitable mortality, even at the very apex of each instant of sweetness or joy. What could be more intangible and difficult to articulate? Nevertheless, the poet finds a linked series of metaphors, given not only concrete but also lyrical and metrical shape.

“To Earthward” is not a long poem—eight quatrains, no more, no less; it is as decorous in appearance as well as in cadence (I will never forget hearing Robert Pinsky incant it from memory at the opening of the Old Dominion Literary Festival in the fall of 1998 in such an electrifying way that for a moment I thought it was a poem by a more contemporary poet and not by Robert Frost). Frost finds the images and metaphors to lead the way ahead of us into the poem. The imagery in itself is not inordinately complex, and the poem’s language is never purely for embellishment. Its accessibility and directness are some of the things that help to most firmly establish the emotional tenor and outlook of the poem, from the opening quatrain’s nearly unbearable kiss that dissolves into air almost as quickly as it’s bestowed, to the scent of “musk/ From hidden grapevine springs” spilling downhill, as though it, too, was magnetized by gravity; to the succession of juxtaposed images yoking each bright experience to its opposite—both the “swirl” and the “ache” in gathering sprigs of honeysuckle, both the sweetness and the sting of the rose, the joy and salt, bark and clove, bitterness and burning.

But it is, above all, dissembling artistry— what’s done with form (the art that conceals that it is art), in harnessing the structural, rhythmical and musical qualities to echo the conceptual and emotional instances of the poem’s utterance, that make it heart-stoppingly memorable. Each quatrain’s first three lines (mostly in dactylic meter, occasionally alternating with iambs) have six syllables—a metrical and visual pun, steering the poem, and its subject, to a consideration of that final destination “earthward;” but then there is the fourth line in each stanza with four syllables, as if to introduce the effect as well as the idea of variation and surprise, despite the apparently preordained, despite the inevitability of foreknowledge.

True enough, the givens of human mortality are acknowledged by the poet; but I find further that within the formal elaboration of this idea in the poem, there is an instinctive rebelliousness that belongs wholeheartedly to the “impetuousness” of art and its declaration of fidelity to the lived instant (all that teases us with unbearable sweetness and fire). If we consider how enjambments or runovers occur most typically across lines, and perhaps less frequently between or across stanzas, the occurrence of at least two of the latter in Frost’s poem (between stanzas 1 and 2, 5 and 6, perhaps even between 7 and 8), cannot be viewed as merely accidental. Alfred Corn notes that the enjambment functions to “[summon] up the image of someone taking a long step between separate footholds…almost as though the step taken is a bit of a stretch.”

The effect of its reading then is as an elaboration of that mood we more familiarly recognize from his “Stopping By Woods on a Snowy Evening,” where the poet/persona considers the seductive invitation of the woods so “lovely, dark and deep” and weighs them against the catalogue of human cares and obligations. In “To Earthward,” the poet is more ripe to the aspect of what it might be “To feel the earth as rough/ To all my length,” addressing his mortality as though it were a lover he would welcome and embrace to more intensely feel the compressed sweetness, the hurt and weight and strength of all that’s brought him, most finally, to himself. But even then, he holds something back from this surrender: a human tenuousness, a stubborn attachment perhaps to what he loves and feels reluctant to leave in the world. In the end, the human imagination resists complete capitulation even at the point of failing or falling. And it is this double pull toward innate gravity and to its transcendence, this tension that rewards the reader in the recognition that besides earth, the self’s other lover is here too: “I lived on air.”


(from "Some Poems I Love Best", Luisa A. Igloria, in 7 x 10: World Poetry Choices by Seven Filipino Poets, ed. Alfred A. Yuson, Libris Books, 2003)
...
...

Saturday, September 01, 2007

dear reader

Some people (artists, writers, musicians, what-have-you) do what they do for the pure joy of it. i envy that freedom. Of course, writing gives me deep pleasure. i wouldn't do it otherwise; there are so many other things i have to do that i do not enjoy. But i know that, fundamentally, i write for other reasons. To communicate, to be understood, to create something beautiful, to change the world, or, if not the world, then at least whatever small part of the world i have it in my power to change. (Yes, i know how idealistic that sounds. Forgive me. i am an idealist.) And when it appears that these purposes are not accomplished, a crucial part of the motivation for writing is lost.

That explains the dry periods on my blogs. They are the times when i lose faith in what i'm doing, when it appears i'm writing into a void. Because communicating, being understood, and yes, changing the world, necessarily involve other people. Even beauty needs a beholder. So you, Dear Reader, are far more important than you actually realise as far as keeping this blog going is concerned. i write, unfortunately or not, for an audience, and i need to know the audience is there. So, leave your comments: argue, endorse, rant, respond.

This writing for an audience thing means, i think, that i'll never be a writer in the way other people i know are writers. These people write because it is who they are. i cannot imagine them apart from their writing; for them, writing has its own necessity. i know that if i ever find a better way of doing all the things i try to do through my writing, the writing will probably peter out. i'm not sure if i'm happy with that, but that is just the way it is.
...
...